We Care About Your Cause
Our National Network of Lawyers and Citizen Rights Group are fighting for your Constitutional Rights Every Day.
Please Visit all of these websites for the latest on the fight for America's Freedom.
AmericasFrontlineAttorneys.com | Coming Soon
Coronavirus is the only virus ever in history to be counted differently by Coroners and Hospitals.
The Memo by the National Vital Statistics System on the New ICD code introduced for how to count COVID-19 deaths.
The Playbook of how the CDC and DHHS fosters fear to promote selling vaccines.
"As health professionals develop health communication for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we implore that these communication approaches do not include fear appeals. Fear appeals, also known as scare tactics, have been widely used to promote recommended preventive behaviors. We contend that unintended negative outcomes can result from fear appeals that intensify the already complex pandemic and efforts to contain it. We encourage public health professionals to reevaluate their desire to use fear appeals in COVID-19 ... "
COVID-19 & Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Effects on Individuals, Institutions and Society - By Peter R. Breggin, MD.
Introduction: Basic Scientific and Political Principles Applied to COVID-19
The Truth in Science and Health Act
This bill is being provided to ensure the citizens of the State of _______ are given true and honest information related to science and their health.
Be it enacted as follows:
a. Any intentional misrepresentation or dissemination of misleading information related to science, public health, medicine, or medical devices, by any person, entity, or organization in or availing themselves of the privilege and opportunity of doing business in the state of _________ shall subject themselves and that entity and/or organization to civil liability. In addition, the acts described in this subsection shall also be deemed an act or acts of fraud. Information put forth without intent to mislead or in error is not subject to this liability
Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS
and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these
vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the
traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to
elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective
of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This
risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols
9 Dance Studios sue government officials and agencies for closing them. They argue that Big Box Retailers stayed open while small businesses were destroyed by government shutdowns.
Lockdown Policy Based on Flawed Computer Models Predicting Millions of Deaths
What Happened to the Curve?
The Impact of the State’s Reaction to COVID-19
The Fallacy of Asymptomatic Spread Psychological Approach to State/National Public Manipulation
How Dangerous is COVID-19 Really? Irrational Behavior of NM Governor
Is it legal or acceptable to mislead the Supreme Court of the United States? And second, should the Courts afford broad enough power to unelected bureaucrats that they may mislead the people, politicians, and Supreme Court of the United States, when those actions result in the abridgement of fundamental rights – such as freedom of religion?
Today before the Court, Plaintiffs bring several counts, but really only two major
A. Can a federal agency intentionally mislead the public to an extent that Constitutional freedoms are lost, people are dying from policies based on those misrepresentations, and even an election is potentially impacted by policies created in reaction to this data?
B. Do facts matter in our judicial system or have we come to a point that procedural and judicial precedents may be used to circumvent truth and justice when the law is plainly being violated?
A new poll has revealed precisely how badly the Republican base feels DeWine is handling the response to COVID-19. For months Ohio Stands Up! has been asking why Mike DeWine is governing against the will of his base and why Jane Timken has been supporting this. There does not appear to be an answer to this question but this poll makes it clear that it is not going well.
The poll of Republican primary voters shows that nearly 78% disapprove of DeWine’s response to coronavirus and nearly 85% do not believe the stay-at-home orders and business restrictions are effective at preventing the spread of coronavirus. To further back up the dissatisfaction with what is happening, when asked what the most important issues facing Ohio are beyond coronavirus, by an overwhelming majority, the top four responses were government overreach, jobs, DeWine, and the economy. It goes without saying that all four of these indicate the complete failure of the administration in its response to COVID-19.
“Governor DeWine, with the help of his cronies, has spent nearly a year lying about COVID-19 and destroying Ohio’s families and economy – the people are done” says Attorney Thomas Renz.
A federal judge in Pittsburgh on Monday found that orders issued by Gov. Tom Wolf restricting the size of gatherings and closing non-essential businesses to protect against the spread of covid-19 were unconstitutional.
In a statement, Wolf said his office will seek an immediate stay to halt the order and file an appeal .U.S. District Judge William S. Stickman IV wrote in his 66-page opinion that even though the actions taken in the spring by Wolf and Health Secretary Dr. Rachel Levine were laudable, they violated the First Amendment right to freedom of assembly, and the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the 14th Amendment.
“It’s a complete and total victory for the counties, the businesses and the representatives,” said attorney Thomas W. King III, who represented the plaintiffs in the case. “You can’t order the entire population of Pennsylvania to stay at home.”
Want the very latest on legal cases against COVID Corruption and Censorship?
Stay informed with our weekly email newsletter with invaluable information on the Medical Freedom Front from our Nationwide Network of Legal and Citizen Action Organizations.