Let me begin this article by first noting this is basically my musings and then providing a few reality checks. The first reality check is that there is truly zero chance of anyone with authority to charge Biden, Obama, and/or Clinton with any of the crimes they may have committed doing so (except maybe Durham). Second, despite the fact that I am including a number of legal bases here related to several crimes there is a lot that would go into this occurring, so this is really an academic discussion based on my opinions (sorry DHS – I still have the right to express an opinion). With that said let’s talk about criminal behavior of the O’Biden family crime syndicate.
Before we go any further, please take a look at my previous post on the war against America at The Summer of Rage & Continuation of the COVID War On America. While this very short overview would need substantial development to be useful in a court, for purposes of this opinion article it is sufficient. For the record, it is my opinion that what is happening in America today is a war against our laws and founding principles in every way except for (thankfully) the use of overt violence. I pray we do not see that.
Sooo… sedition. Conspiracy to commit sedition, treason, and several other crimes are defined in various laws and look a bit like 18 U.S. Code § 2384:
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
A lot of people want to know why Biden, Clinton, Obama, etc. have not been credibly charged with treason, sedition, etc. The reason is that the law requires that the conspiracy or action include the use of, or plan to use force. As a side note, it is worth noting for the Bernie Sanders/Antifa crowd that the Communist Party has been held to be seditious in Skeffington v. Katzeff, 277 F. 129, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1735 (1st Cir. 1922).
Bearing in mind that the use of force is a requirement to many of these laws, I am going to make a legal argument here that no one will follow and would be tough to win. The use of force requirement was expanded in Bryant v. United States, 257 F. 378, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2212 (5th Cir. 1919); Enfield v. United States, 261 F. 141, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1732 (8th Cir. 1919) where the court held that no “overt” action was required to meet the “use of force” requirement. It could be argued that the Bryant ruling opened the door to recognition that unconventional war, such as is occurring right now against the US, would qualify under this statute. If a federal executive has the power to force compliance with actions that would otherwise qualify as seditious or treasonous, perhaps that would qualify as “a use of force”. This is a concept that the CRT uses when talking about police using the “force” of their authority against people of color so why wouldn’t it apply to an executive branch official? Afterall, Obama, Biden, Clinton, and the FBI certainly have more power than a local police officer. Again, I think it may be a bit of a stretch, and may not even be a good idea (law of unintended consequences), but it is interesting to think about if you are a legal nerd.
So lets talk about potentially criminal actions. Top at the list today is Biden. Biden is using [arguably] force, in the form of police power and head of the DOJ, to “prevent, hinder, or delay” the First and Second Amendment in any way he can get away with. He is openly working with big tech to push censorship and even creating a ministry of Truth which looks a lot like a communist action to me.
Beyond the notes in my previous Substack and above, he is also working to erode our sovereignty with his push to empower the WHO. Much of the reporting about the application of Biden’s proposed amendments is a bit exaggerated but his actions there are quite clearly against the interests of America. Again, given the left’s constant whining about power dynamics, wouldn’t it then be true that someone with the power of the presidency would be “using force” against the people he is supposed to be representing by taking actions against our nation that he alone has the power to enforce?
How about Clinton and Obama (and Biden for that matter… he just cannot commit too many crimes), and their role in Russia-Gate. For anyone living under a rock that is unfamiliar with the story, here is a short timeline:
Someone reportedly hacks a DNC/Hillary Clinton server – panic ensues that the truth about these people might be leaked.
In response, Clinton appears to have funded (with their media partners) all sorts of conspiracies including everything from peeing prostitutes to the Steele Dossier.
The Dossier was entirely garbage – bought and paid for by Clinton – but pushed as fact and acted as the basis for the Trump/Russia collusion lie.
Clinton fed this lie to the Obama crew and, despite the fact that a four-year-old could figure out that it was garbage, Obama and crew decided to “investigate” Trump for it illegally. This was pretty clearly done to influence the election and it also appears Obama knew and participated in this.
Biden’s national security advisor, Jake Sullivan, and the FBI jumped in to further promote the obvious fake news to hurt Trump further, going so far as to get illegal warrants based on fake info to tap Trumps phone lines so they could spy on his campaign (of course the claim they were not feeding the info to the Clinton campaign but if you believe that I have a bridge to sell you).
In the months between the 2016 election and the inauguration it appears the Clinton and Obama teams worked together to hatch a plan to undermine the Trump presidency.
The swamp kicked into action as soon as Trump was inaugurated to did everything in their power to overthrow and put down the President. Many of these actions were done under the guise of “official business” which carries the force of various executive branch agencies.
A lot more happened and I will not regurgitate all the findings of the Clinton Russia scandal here, but if Clinton, Obama, and Biden were actually working with each other and our enemies to prevent Trump’s election and inauguration in bad faith, they would essentially be doing all the things they accused Trump of doing after the 2020 election. They would also likely be breaking numerous laws. These actions (discussed in numerous places such as here and here) were legitimately a conspiracy to prevent a free, fair, and legal election. I will let Durham make this case, but it certainly is not a stretch to suggest that this was seditious behavior in all ways except the overt use of force and maybe the use of the “force” of power in the executive branch was a use of force.
If the left views the power dynamics in race relations as being akin to the use of force, wouldn’t the power dynamics of a president and the executive branch qualify as the “use of force” when it pertains to stomping out the rights of all Americans?
Understand that writing a short article talking about the potential for serious crimes is substantially different than prosecuting a case. I do not expect to see sedition or treason charges against any big names, but I do find the hypocrisy to be telling and also think we need to strengthen our laws to ensure elected officials cannot hide behind their position if their actions are intentionally injurious to America’s interests.